Start Position
2.       INTRODUCTION OF MEMBERS AND CITY STAFF
3.       STATEMENT OF PURPOSE OF THE HPC
4.       APPROAL PROCESS 5.       EXPLANATION OF COMMISISON PROCEDURES 6.       VERIFICATION OF “No Conflict of Interest” AND VERIFICATION OF “Proper Notification”
7.       CONTINUED CASES TO BE HEARD        HPC-16-22 Joe Shirley petitions for a Certification of Appropriateness for signage on the property        Located at 516 19th Avenue in the Druid City Historic District. (Council District 4) CONTINIUED          FROM MAY 2022
APPROVED          HPC-18-22 Robert Deason petitions for a Certificate of Appropriateness or the construction of an        Accessory structure on the property located at402 27thg Ave in the Pinehurst Historic District.        (Council District 4)   CONTINUED FROM MAY 2022)
APPROVED   8.       CASES TO BE HEARD               HPC-20-22 Julie Meggs petitions for a Certificate of Appropriateness for signage on the               Property located at 1818 University Boulevard in the Druid City Historic District. (Council               District 1)
APPROVED                 HPC--21-22 Jim and Tia Sledge petitions for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a material               Change to three windows on the primary structure located at 1700 Dearing Place in the Dearing               Place Historic District (Council District 4)
APPROVED                HPC-22-22 Bill Edwards petitions for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a material change to              The roof on the primary structure located at 2010 9th Street in the Druid City Historic District.              (Council District 4)
APPROVED WITH CONDITION: THE ROOFING MATREIAL TO BE THE 26 GUAGE                HPC-23-22 Randy Treglown petitions for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the removal of              Three trees located at 1718 3rd Street in the Pinehurst Historic District. (Council District 4)
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS: ·         THE PETITIONER IS APPROVED TO REMOVE TWO PINE TREES ·         THE COMMISSION WILL WAIVE THE 180 DAY REQUIREMENT TO COME BACK BEFORE THE COMMISSION FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE PIN OAK, OR THE PETITIONER CAN SUBMIT AN EXPEDITED REVIEW WITH AN ARBORIST LETTER TO REMOVE THE PIN OAK.   9.       OTHER BUSINESS   There were seven (7) Historic Expedited Review Approvals for the month of June     10.   ADJOURN @ 6:14 p.m.
Link
Start video at
Social
Embed

* you need to log in to manage your favorites

My Favorites List
You haven't added any favorites yet. Click the "Add Favorite" button on any media page, and they'll show up here.
Loading...
Unable to preview the file.
scroll up